The World Health Organization (WHO) anticipates a rapid decline in the consumption of tobacco and it’s by-products in Australia, as the country wins the right to continue producing plain, unmarked packages for the drug, making it less recognizable, and reducing patronage.
“Today we are celebrating a major victory for public health and tobacco control”, WHO revealed in a press statement on Tuesday.
The decision had previously been heavily disputed by a number of countries, including Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Honduras, Indonesia and Ukraine.
“On June 9, the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Appellate Body reported on the dispute brought by Honduras and the Dominican Republic against Australia: “Australia — Tobacco Plain Packaging.
This decision puts an end to the disputes which began in 2012 and saw Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Honduras, Indonesia and Ukraine (Ukraine later decided to withdraw its complaint in June 2015)bring legal complaints regarding Australia’s plain packaging law”, WHO stated.
“This decision represents a landmark victory for global health and a major setback for the tobacco industry. Plain packaging is consistent with international trade law as part of a comprehensive approach to tobacco control that protects people from the harms caused by tobacco” , says Dr Adriana Blanco Marquizo, Head of the Convention Secretariat.
The rest of the Statement reads:
The World Health Organization (WHO) and the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) Secretariat had previously provided the WTO panel with a joint submission or amicus brief, giving an overview of global tobacco control, and summarizing the public health evidence underlying tobacco plain packaging and the relevant provisions of the WHO FCTC and its Guidelines.
On 28 June 2018, the panel report was circulated, deciding that Australia’s policy on plain packaging was consistent with WTO law.
As a result, Honduras appealed to the Appellate Body the panel’s report. This appeal was consolidated with the one from the Dominican Republic, into one that has now ended with the Appellate Body decision published. Cuba and Indonesia accepted the Panel’s decision, opting not to appeal.
At the WTO, Australia’s plain packaging law had been challenged primarily on grounds that it was more restrictive of trade than necessary to protect human health, and that it unjustifiably interfered with use of tobacco company trademarks on packaging.
These and other claims were rejected by a WTO Panel and appeals from the Dominican Republic and Honduras have now been rejected. This outcome is in line with litigation in other countries, which has uniformly rejected tobacco industry challenges to plain packaging
By dismissing appeals from the Dominican Republic and Honduras, the WTO Appellate Body Report finally ends the legal challenges to Australia’s tobacco plain packaging law at the WTO. Australia’s law withstood a domestic legal challenge, an investment treaty claim and the WTO challenges.
Although some other countries implementing plain packaging have faced legal challenges from the tobacco industry, there are no other legal disputes on plain packaging at the WTO.
According to the WHO statement, the Appellate Body confirmed:
- The panel’s findings that plain packaging is “apt to, and does, contribute” to Australia’s objective of improving public health by reducing tobacco consumption and exposure to tobacco smoke;
- The panel’s finding that plain packaging is no more trade-restrictive than necessary for achieving that public health objective;
- That plain packaging does not “unjustifiably encumber by special requirements” the use of trademarks in the course of trade, therefore that the trademark restrictions arising from plain packaging are justified by their contribution to public health objectives.
- The Appellate Body ruling finally clears the legal hurdle thrown up in the tobacco industry’s efforts to block tobacco control and is likely to accelerate implementation of plain packaging around the globe.
- The Convention Secretariat recognizes the importance of this decision to allow the 182 Parties to the WHO FCTC to implement as agreed, through Article 11 of the Convention, effective packaging and labelling measures and, through Article 13, to undertake a comprehensive ban (or restrictions) on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship, without breaching WTO law.
The following WTO Members reserved their third-party rights: Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, the European Union, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malawi, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Panama, Peru, the Philippines, Singapore, South Africa, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, the United States of America, Uruguay, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
You may be interested
Man United Seek First Premier League Win Over Liverpool In Three YearsWebby - October 24, 2021
Two of England’s heavyweights Manchester United and Liverpool will go head-to-head at Old Trafford today in what promises to be…
JUST IN: APC National Chairman Storms Tinubu’s House [ PHOTOS]Webby - October 24, 2021
Mallam Mai Mala Buni, the chairman of the APC caretaker committee has paid a courtesy visit on Asiwaju Bola Ahmed…
Dennis Rated Watford’s Second Best Player In Massive Win Over EvertonWebby - October 24, 2021
Emmanuel Dennis was rated Watford’s second best player in their 5-2 win at Everton in the Premier League on Saturday.The…