Revealed! How LASU Pro-Chancellor, VC Diverted N198 Million Staff Pension To Buy Luxury Vehicles

The management also used an additional N83.37 million from the same fund to buy four buses, documents obtained by this newspaper revealed.

The N281 million was part of N474 million withdrawn in October 2018 purportedly to finance the National University Commission’s (NUC) accreditation of some academic programmes in the university. Nigeria’s pension legislation prohibits such withdrawal.

The management of LASU collects pension contributions of staff members and remits them to Pension Fund Administrators (PFAs). However, a good percentage of the university’s employees are not registered with any PFA.

PREMIUM TIMES learnt that those without PFAs wanted their pension funds to be administered by the Nigerian University Pension Management Company (NUPEMCO), which was only licensed National Pension Commission PENCOM in February after a nationwide strike by university lecturers, ASUU.

For those employees awaiting the registration of NUPEMCO, the university kept their pension contributions in an escrow account, a practice that PENCOM said negates pension regulation.

“There is a regulation that when employees do not open a retirement savings account, the organisation has the liberty to approach a pension fund administrator and transfer those funds there. Those funds will be kept in what we called a Transitional Contributory Fund Account pending when they open a retirement savings account,” Peter Aghahowa, spokesperson for PENCOM, told PREMIUM TIMES.

“The account is domiciled with the PFA. The whole idea about the regulation is that the account should not be domiciled with the employer because, no matter if it is placed in an escrow account or not, there is the tendency of those funds being used when there is pressure.

“From the little I have heard, quite clearly, the university didn’t follow the regulations through. The things they ought to have done, some of them they didn’t do,” he added.

Section 60, subsection 2 and 3 of the Pension Reform Act, 2014 buttresses the explanation of Mr Aghahowa.

“All companies and institutions already engaged in the management of pension funds who are not licensed by the commission shall, at the commencement of this Act, compute and credit all contributions to Retirement Savings Account opened by them for each contributor including distributable income,” it says.

“All companies and institutions referred to in subsection (2) of this section shall transfer all pension funds and assets held by them to Pension Fund Administrators and Pension Fund Custodians as may be determined by the Commission.”

Also, Section 70 subsection 2 of the Pension Reform Act 2014 forbids a custodian of workers’ pension – LASU management in this case – from using the pension to meet its own obligations.

“The Pension Fund Custodian shall not utilise any pension fund or assets in its custody to meet its own financial obligations to any person whatsoever,” the section of the act stated.

Breaking the law

But the withdrawal in October 2018 was not the first time LASU’s management would unlawfully withdraw money from its staff’s pension savings.

In March 2018, the university management withdrew N215 million from the pension escrow account to fund the accreditation of 17 academic programmes.

An internal memorandum of the university’s governing council ratifying an executive order of the university’s pro-chancellor and chairman of the Governing Council, Adebayo Ninalowo, said that the Lagos State Government had approved N215 million for the accreditation, but was yet to release the fund; therefore, the university had to borrow from the staff’s pension account.

“In view of the pending accreditation exercise and the time constraint, the university sought and obtained the executive approval of the Pro-Chancellor and Chairman of the Governing Council for temporary borrowing of the sum of two hundred and fifteen million naira [N215,000,000.00] from the university’s pension/escrow investment in order to cover the expenses of the forthcoming accreditation exercise which would be paid back from the approved grant from the Lagos State Government, when paid to the university,” the internal memo stated.

However, a June 21, 2018 bulletin of the university’s branch of Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) claimed that only N148 million was actually disbursed for the said accreditation exercises.

The bulletin, which gave a breakdown of the amount spent on the exercise for each of the 17 programmes and other related financial obligations, frowned at how the money was disbursed.

It claimed that top academic staff of the affected programmes were blindsided from the exercise.

“It is noteworthy that principal officers and senior non-academic staff members were mostly the ones who oversaw the supervision and disbursement of accreditation funds for various academic programmes in these faculties,” the bulletin, which was co-signed by Tony Dansu, the secretary of the union and his assistant, Adeolu Oyekan, alleged.

For instance, the union claimed the immediate past registrar of the university was placed in charge of the accreditation of academic programmes in the Faculty of Education with a budget of N23.5 million.

The university’s bursar, Adetayo Hassan, was placed in charge of the exercise at the faculty of Management Science with a budget of N19.5million, while the university’s director of internal audit, Said Olayinka, was placed in charge of Engineering and given a budget of N51 million for the exercise.

More withdrawals

By October, the university embarked on another accreditation exercise. This time the university pro-chancellor unilaterally ordered the withdrawal of N474 million from the staff Pension Investment Fund account for the accreditation of 20 academic programmes.

According to the October 5 memo, the state government had promised to release funds for the accreditation, but the money had not come and the university was unsure when it would arrive. The university said it, therefore, took alternative steps so as not to miss out of “securing full accreditation for the affected programmes”.

In doing so, it promised that the fund would be returned with interest as soon as it received the fund for the exercise promised by the state government.

PREMIUM TIMES could not confirm if the funds withdrawn from the staff pension account on both occasions had been returned as promised by the university’s management.

When asked if indeed the government assured the university that it was going to provide the fund for both exercises, Obafela Bank-Olemoh, the special adviser on education to the governor of Lagos State, Akinwunmi Ambode, declined to comment.

“I am not going to respond to that. I don’t work in LASU,” he said.

“My brother write your story. I am not going to respond to anything. You are writing a story about LASU, reach out to LASU and let them respond to you,” said Mr Bank-Olemoh, who is in charge of tertiary education in the state.

Beyond Approval Limits

But sources within the university, who asked not to be named for fear of being victimised told PREMIUM TIMES that apart from the illegality of tampering with staff’s pension fund, the amount Mr Ninalowo, the pro-chancellor, approved for withdrawal was way above his approval limit.

According to a February 23, 2016, internal memo of the university’s governing council obtained by PREMIUM TIMES, the expenditure approval limit of the university’s pro-chancellor was reviewed upward from N10 million to N20 million while that of the university’s vice chancellor was reviewed upward from N3 million to N5 million.

For the expenditure of any amount beyond fund above N20 million, the pro-chancellor has to seek the approval of the governing council after first discussing such expenditure with the Finance and General Purpose Committee (F&GPC) of the council.

In both cases above, our sources alleged that the withdrawals were unilaterally done by the pro-chancellor without recourse to the F&GPC. An internal memo seen by this newspaper suggested that in the October 2018 withdrawal of N474 million, the university management secured the approval of the governing council after the fact.

“In view of the impending accreditation exercise and the time constraint, the university sought and obtained the executive approval of the Pro-Chancellor and Chairman of the governing council for temporary borrowing of the sum of four hundred and seventy four million naira [N474,000,000.00] from the university Pension Investment Fund in order to cover the expenses of the forthcoming accreditation exercise,” the memo stated.

The memo added that the governing council ratified the approval after deliberation.

Purchase of Luxury Cars

Sources in the university told this newspaper that the management decided to use a large chunk of the money for things with completely no correlation with that for which it was withdrawn. More than one source said the university also cut corners and came up with ploys that fooled the team of NUC accreditation assessors.

The NUC accreditation process involves the assessment of seven components of an academic programme – academic matters, staffing, physical facilities, library, funding and employer’s rating of graduates.

However, the university management used the lion share of the fund to purchase of 12 luxury vehicles for top management staff, which have nothing to do with the accreditation process.

The vehicles were three pieces of Toyota Corolla1.8 Gli CVT AT LS Luxury model at N63 million plus VAT, seven pieces of Toyota Corolla 1,8 Gli CVT AT FS luxury model at N113.9 million, and two pieces of Toyota Yaris Sedan AT LS (New Model) at N21.42 million for a total of N198.34 million.

The university’s vice-chancellor, Olanrewaju Fagbohun, also approved the purchase of four 18-seater buses for a total sum of N83.37 million.

The cars were distributed to top management members in the week of October 22, 2018, our investigation revealed.

“A total sum of N198,345,000 was expended on the 12 cars, which will not be assessed by the NUC, whereas the classrooms, staff and departmental offices, studios and laboratories that would be evaluated for the accreditation remains in pitiable conditions,” another source said.

While the school management spent the funds on the purchase of luxury vehicles, it only approved a fraction of the budgets sent in by departments for the exercises. For instance, the Department of Zoology requested N60 million for the exercise but the university only approved N13 million.

A source told PREMIUM TIMES that the School of Agriculture requested N400,000.00 to procure the cable needed to install internet in the faculty, the project was aborted midway allegedly on the orders of the vice chancellor. But before the team of NUC assessors arrived the faculty for the accreditation exercise, the university had purchased Wi-Fi dongles which was given to a number of employees to create the impression that the faculty had a functional internet connection.

“After the accreditation exercises, the internet disappeared,” the source said.

“The bitter truth about this charade of accreditation preparation is that offices for the staff and programmes were mostly never upgraded but rather, some stranded offices of other departments and staff were hurriedly tagged as belonging to the programmes earmarked for accreditation,” the source added.

One of our sources alleged that one of the Toyota Corolla purportedly bought for the accreditation exercise was given to the pro-chancellor.

“I challenge the university administration to list how the vehicles were distributed. This is one of the reasons why the pro-chancellor will always approve executively all demands of the university management without recourse to the F&GPC or the governing council,” the source added.

The vice-chancellor, Olanrewaju Fagbohun, did not respond to questions sent to his email despite an automated response confirming that the questions were delivered.

Ademola Adekoya, the LASU spokesperson, who originally did not respond to questions sent to him for comment, later told this reporter upon a follow-up call that the university management has decided to be “quiet for now.”

“If there are people who want to know, they should actually get the facts right. Because, most of the things (claims), they are not actually correct. We don’t want to respond to it.”

***