Falana condemns Judges attack on public interest litigation

June 3, 2019
61 Views
https://nationaldailyng.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/966-Babe-320x100.gif

A frontline human rights lawyer, Femi Falana SAN, has condemned Judges over attacks on public interest litigation by legal practitioners in Nigeria.

Falana decried that in recent time, some High Court Judges were reported to have imposed fines ranging from N5 million to N10 million on concerned citizens whose cases were struck out for want of locus standi.

Falana had protested: “With respect, the renewed attack on public interest litigation by judges cannot be justified under the Constitution and the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act.

“Specifically, the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009 have enjoined judges to encourage public interest litigation in promoting the human rights of Nigerian people.

“Ex abundanti cautela, the doctrine of locus standi has been abolished in the area of human rights by Order III of the Fundamental Rights Enforcement Procedure Rules 2009.”

He argued that “Since access to court has been guaranteed by sections 6 and 36 of the 1999 Constitution and article 7 of the African Charter on Hunan and Peoples Rights Act, it is illegal and unconstitutional to impose fines on aggrieved citizens who approach the courts to challenge the illegal official policies or unconstitutuonal legislations under the current democratic dispensation.”

Falana maintained: “as far as the law stands, no judge has the power to order a litigant to pay costs outside the ambit of the Rules of the respective High Courts.

“Even in the award of costs litigants and their counsel are given fair hearing by judges. Why then are fines imposed on litigants or lawyers without allowing them to make any representation?”

The human rights lawyer, therefore, declared: “I wish to state that no judge is empowered by the Constitution, High Court Law or Rules of Court to impose fines of N5 million or N10 million on a litigant who has not been tried and convicted for committing a criminal offence in Nigeria.

“We are, therefore, compelled to draw the attention of our judges to the case of Fawehinmi v Akilu (1997) NWLR (Pt 65) 979 wherein the Supreme Court overruled the case of Abraham Adesanya v The President (1981) ANLR 1.

“Since the anachronistic doctrine has been set aside to pave way for public interest litigation, our judges should desist from striking out or dismissing cases which are filed to challenge impunity of public officers in Nigeria,” Falana advocated.

Post Views: 93

You may be interested

“48 In Lagos, 8 In Rivers” – Nigeria Records 82 New Coronavirus Cases As Total Rises To 67,412
News
News

“48 In Lagos, 8 In Rivers” – Nigeria Records 82 New Coronavirus Cases As Total Rises To 67,412

Webby - November 30, 2020

The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) has recorded 82 new cases of coronavirus, bringing the total number of infections…

Jude, Ify Okoye celebrate their daughter at 6
News
News

Jude, Ify Okoye celebrate their daughter at 6

Webby - November 29, 2020

<!-- --> Jude Okoye’s daughter By Jennifer Okundia C.E.O Northside Music Limited and Northside Entertainment front-liner, Jude Okoye and his…

Call for medical panel to examine Buhari’s mental state
News
1 views
News
1 views

Call for medical panel to examine Buhari’s mental state

Webby - November 29, 2020

<!-- President Buhari: a citizen calls for medical panel to examine mental state --> President Buhari: a citizen thinks everything…

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.