South Korea on Tuesday expressed strong regret over Japan’s decision to release contaminated water into the sea from its wrecked Fukushima nuclear power plant.
Tokyo announced earlier in the day that it plans to start releasing massive amounts of radioactive water, which has been stored in tanks at the wrecked Fukushima nuclear plant, in two years.
Koo Yoon-cheol, head of South Korea’s Office for Government Policy Coordination, gathered an emergency vice-ministerial meeting at 10 a.m. at the Seoul government complex to discuss Seoul’s position and measures on Japan’s announcement.
“The government expresses strong regret over the Japanese government’s decision to release contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear plant into the ocean,’’ Koo said in news.
He added that the government would take every necessary measure in line with the principle of keeping the South Korean people safe from the contaminated water from the Fukushima plant.
Seoul strongly urged Tokyo to ensure the transparent disclosure and verification of information related to the overall treatment process of the contaminated water.
“In regard to Tokyo’s latest decision, we will clearly deliver our people’s protest to the Japanese government. We will demand specific measures from Japan to ensure the safety of our people and prevent damage to the marine environment,’’ Koo added.
Koo also said the government would refer its concerns to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and request the international community to objectively review safety issues related to the Fukushima water release.
Seoul also plans to strengthen radiation checks on imported foods and inspections of origins for food imports, Koo said.
In response to what appears to be Washington’s consent towards Tokyo’s decision, Koo said he believes that the U.S. State Department’s statement leaned more towards emphasising the need for IAEA verification.
“We have delivered our concerns to the U.S., but the U.S. may react that way since South Korea is a state neighbour (of Japan) and the U.S. is located for more distant (than South Korea),’’ Koo said.
The U.S. State Department said on a website that Japan “has been transparent about its decision’’ on the Fukushima water release and that it appears to have adopted an approach in accordance with globally accepted nuclear safety standards.’’
Tokyo had been widely expected to announce its plan to gradually release into the Pacific Ocean more than 1.2 million tons of radioactive water stored in tanks since the 2011 meltdowns following an earthquake and tsunami.
Japan argued that it was the most realistic and relatively harmless disposal method, but the plan had sparked strong opposition and worries among the public in both Korea and Japan.
In a virtual press briefing for local media in March, a Japanese government official said Tokyo cannot continue to delay the disposal of contaminated water from the crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant due to tank storage limits.
Later in the day, Seoul’s foreign ministry called in Koichi Aiboshi, Japan’s top envoy to Seoul, to protest Tokyo’s decision to release the contaminated water from the wrecked nuclear power plant.
Political parties also unanimously denounced Tokyo and demanded that Japan immediately revoke its controversial decision.
“The unilateral decision to release contaminated water into the ocean despite opposition from the international community is a shameless and selfish act,’’ Choi Ji-eun, the ruling Democratic Party’s spokesperson for international affairs, said.
Won Hee-ryong, the governor of South Korea’s southern island of Jeju, also said he would call in Japan’s consul general for the island and form a contingency commission to deal with the water release with heads of local governments in the southeastern region.
Civic groups in South Korea also expressed resentment toward the Japanese government and pledged to do everything possible to prevent what they call nuclear terror.
“The Japanese government said it will gradually release radioactive water after diluting it to a level that is harmless to the human body.
“But diluting will not change the total amount of radioactive materials released into the sea,’’ an alliance of 31 anti-nuclear and environmental civic groups said in a joint statement.
The groups warned that the release of Fukushima water would become an irreparable disaster for humans beyond the marine ecosystem.
You may be interested
Govt approach wrong, ransom payment won’t end kidnapping – ObasanjoWebby - May 6, 2021
FORMER President, Olusegun Obasanjo, on Wednesday declared that governments of former President, Goodluck Jonathan, and Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd.)…
Two killed, many injured, others kidnapped as bandits attack 2 churches in KadunaWebby - May 6, 2021
Many have reportedly been killed, injured and kidnapped by armed bandits in fresh attacks on two churches in Gwagwada community,…
Enugu Catholic Bishop behind my two-day ordeal, says MbakaWebby - May 6, 2021
Father Ejike Mbaka Christopher Isiguzo, Arinze Gideon in Enugu and Kingsley Nwezeh in Abuja Fiery Catholic Priest and Spiritual Director…