Alleged N2.1bn fraud: Why Appeal Court rejected Dokpesi’s appeal

September 4, 2020
3 Views

More facts are beginning to emerge on why the Court of Appeal on Friday declined jurisdiction to hear an appeal by politician and promoter of DAAR Communications, Raymond Dokpesi, owner of Africa Independent Television (AIT) over an alleged N2.1 billion fraud.

Recall that Dokpesi in a seven-count amended charge filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Dokpesi and DAAR Investment are accused among others, of diverting about N2.1 billion received from the office of National Security Adviser (NSA) while Sambo Dasuki was in charge

They had appealed the November 21, 2018 ruling by the trial judge, Justice John Tsoho, rejecting their no-case submission and ordering them to enter defence.

In a ruling on Friday, a three-man panel of the Court of Appeal held that the two notices of appeal, dated November 26 and 30, 2018, filed jointly for Dokpesi and DAAR Investment by their lawyer, Kanu Agabi (SAN), were incompetent.

In the lead ruling, authored and read by Justice Stephen Adah, the court upheld the argument by lawyer the prosecution, Oluwaleke Atolagbe, to the effect that it was wrong for the two appellants to file joint notices of appeal in a criminal case.

The court noted that Dokpesi and DAAR Investment, named as first and second defendants in the charge before the trial court, are separate entities. It added that in criminal cases, liability is personal.

It held that, by the Rules of the court, Dokpesi, as a natural person, ought to file his separate notice of appeal, which he must either sign personally or by his lawyer, while DAAR Investment, being an artificial person, ought to have its separate notice of appeal signed by one of its senior officials.

The court held that Agabi’s argument that DAAR Investment was not dully arraigned before the trial court was out of place.

It stated that it is the practice that the filing of a notice of appeal must be done personally by an appellant and that where such an appellant is not a person, it must be signed by a senior official of the company.

The court held that, having not complied with the court’s rules; the joint notices of appeal by Dokpesi and DAAR Investment are incompetent, thereby denying the court the requisite jurisdiction to entertain them.

“An appeal initiated without regard for the Rules of court is incompetent. The defect in these notices of appeal cannot be explained away. This appeal is therefore incompetent. It is accordingly struck out,” the court said.

PV: 13

You may be interested

Horror! Over 30 People Feared Dead As Bus Goes Off The Road And Plunges Into A River In Ebonyi
News
News

Horror! Over 30 People Feared Dead As Bus Goes Off The Road And Plunges Into A River In Ebonyi

Webby - September 19, 2020

File photo used only for illustrative purpose PREMIUM TIMES reports that over 30 persons are feared dead in a road…

How Hushpuppi Laundered U.S. Unemployment Benefits – FBI Drops Fresh Evidence
News
1 views
News
1 views

How Hushpuppi Laundered U.S. Unemployment Benefits – FBI Drops Fresh Evidence

Webby - September 19, 2020

Hushpuppi According to a PREMIUM TIMES report, fresh evidence from the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) has revealed how Ramon…

Oh No! People Feared Dead As Two Vehicles Go Up In Flames In Friday Night Tanker Explosion
News
News

Oh No! People Feared Dead As Two Vehicles Go Up In Flames In Friday Night Tanker Explosion

Webby - September 19, 2020

Scene of the incident Vanguard reports that an unspecified number of persons are feared dead and two vehicles burnt in…

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.